LEBEAU v. RAITH et al
MAUREEN LEBEAU |
MICHAEL W. RAITH, DANIELLE HIBBERD, CHRISTINE KATCH, DELAWARE COUNTY, LEANNE MONTGOMERY, JAMES F. MATTERA, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC., CUMMINGS, JOHN AND JANE DOE NO. 1-10 and JOHN AND JANE DOE NO. 11-20 |
2:2017cv00038 |
January 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
GENE E.K. PRATTER |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS AND SHENA CUMMING (DOC. NO. 28 ), IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS HELEN BORRELL AND MICHAEL MOORE (DOC. NO. 32 ), IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT LEANNE MONTGOMERY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 33 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/28/2017. 11/28/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE PRISON DEFENDANTS' MOTION (DOC. NO. 12 ), IS GRANTED AND THE PROBATION DEFENDANTS' MOTION (DOC. NO. 13 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THIS ORDER'S ENTRY ON THE PUBLIC DOCKET. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/23/2017. 5/24/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.