THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY KENDRELL v. DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY et al
| THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY KENDRELL |
| JOHN DOES 1-10 and JIM MATTIS |
| 2:2017cv00229 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| ROBERT F. KELLY |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER THAT THE GOVERMENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 40 ) IS GRANTED. KENDRELL'S PRO SE MOTION FOR CASE TO GO TO TRIAL WITH A JURY (DOC. 41 ) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 11/5/2018. 11/5/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
Filing
27
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (DOC. 15 ) IS DENIED. THE COURT'S ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (DOC. 17 ) IS VACATED AND ALL DEADLINES WITHIN TERMINATED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK PLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO REQUEST A HEARING ON MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT (DOC. 18 ) ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO REOPEN THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 6/19/2018. 6/19/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.