PEPICELLI v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: ANTHONY PEPICELLI
Defendant: INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JOSE CARMONA and LESLEY RUSSEL
Case Number: 2:2017cv00341
Filed: January 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: GENE E.K. PRATTER
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/28/2022. 10/28/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER GRANTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 6, 2022 AT 2:00 P.M.. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/10/2022. 3/10/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 50 IS DENIED AND PARTIES MAY SUBMIT A JOINT STATUS REPORT REGARDING SCHEDULING BY APRIL 7, 2020. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/25/2020. 3/25/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sfl, )
September 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 21) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE DECLARATION OF DAVID SCHOFIELD AND MOTION TO CONVERT (DOCKET NO. 23) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 9/5/18. 9/5/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PEPICELLI v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY PEPICELLI
Represented By: JACOB A. GOLDBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTHONY P. ZOOK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSE CARMONA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LESLEY RUSSEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?