TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. v. SPIRIDON SPIREAS

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. v. SPIRIDON SPIREAS

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. v. SPIRIDON SPIREAS

Plaintiff:	TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:	SPIRIDON SPIREAS
Case Number:	2:2017cv00452
Filed:	January 31, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge:	JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit:	Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2019	Filing 81 ORDER DENYING 60 AND 61 MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/3/19. 9/4/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
October 3, 2017	Filing 34 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE FRAUD/MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM IN COUNT I, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS DENIED ON PLAINTIFFS BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM IN COUNT II. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE BREACH OF THE DUTY OF LOYALTY CLAIM IN COUNT III, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISS ED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY CLAIM IN COUNT IV, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE CONVERSION CLA IM IN COUNT V, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS DENIED ON PLAINTIFFS MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED CLAIM IN COUNT VI. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO JOIN MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 19. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE COURT. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. 10. DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO RESPOND TO AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, SHOULD PLAINTIFF ELECT NOT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN FORTY-FOUR (44) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS IN COUNTS II AND VI. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/3/17. 10/4/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2019

Filing 81 ORDER DENYING 60 AND 61 MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/3/19. 9/4/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

October 3, 2017

Filing 34 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE FRAUD/MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM IN COUNT I, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS DENIED ON PLAINTIFFS BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM IN COUNT II. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE BREACH OF THE DUTY OF LOYALTY CLAIM IN COUNT III, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISS ED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY CLAIM IN COUNT IV, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS GRANTED ON THE CONVERSION CLA IM IN COUNT V, AND THIS CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 16) IS DENIED ON PLAINTIFFS MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED CLAIM IN COUNT VI. PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO JOIN MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 19. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE COURT. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IN WHICH TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. 10. DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO RESPOND TO AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, SHOULD PLAINTIFF ELECT NOT TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN FORTY-FOUR (44) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS IN COUNTS II AND VI. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/3/17. 10/4/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. v. SPIRIDON SPIREAS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC.
Represented By:	ROSEMARY MCKENNA
Represented By:	GRANT S. PALMER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SPIRIDON SPIREAS
Represented By:	TIMOTHY T. MYERS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?