MCCAFFREY v. WINDSOR AT WINDERMERE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
STEPFANIE MCCAFFREY |
WINDSOR AT WINDERMERE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, WINDSOR AT WINDERMERE INVESTORS CORPORATION, WINDSOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, WINDSOR COMMUNITIES, JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANES DOES 1-10 |
2:2017cv00460 |
February 1, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT WINDSOR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY'S (WPMC'S) MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF STEPFANIE MCCAFFREY'S NEW BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO WPMC'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT.NO.43, IS GRANTED AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL STRIKE THE BRIEF PLAINTIFF FILED AT DOCKET NUMBER 41-1; WPMC'S MOTION TO RENEW ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS, DKT. NO.44, IS GRANTED; WPMC'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, DKT.NO.36, IS DENIED; WPMC'S RENEWED MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE TO ISSUE A SUMMONS, DKT. NO.37, IS DENIED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RE-SERVE WPMC, DKT.NO.40, IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF SHALL EFFECTUATE SERVICE ON WPMC IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 4 OF THE FRCP WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 11/15/17. 11/15/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/8/17. 5/9/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.