HUKMAN v. US AIRWAYS/AMERICAN AIRLINES et al
| SHEIDA HUKMAN |
| US AIRWAYS/AMERICAN AIRLINES, BRIAN BEIDLMAN, HARLANS DEWITT, AMY HANDELL and KAREN CRUEY |
| REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC. |
| 2:2017cv00741 |
| February 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| JUAN R. SANCHEZ |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 93) IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. ON ALL CLAIMS IN HUKMAN'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. HUKMAN'S MOTION FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 95) IS DENIED. HUKMAN'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. 104) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. HUKMAN'S MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. 116) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/25/19. 3/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 24) AND DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 25) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTIONS (DOC. 33 & 34) ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/3/17. 8/3/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
