UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
| 2:2017cv01183 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
ORDER THAT THE SPECIAL MASTER'S R&R (DOC. NO. 141 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 3/1/24. 3/1/24 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/1/2022. 4/1/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 56] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE [Doc. No. 57] IS GRANTED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. NO. 58] IS GRANTED AS TO CLAIMS ALLEGING CONSPIRACY BETWEEN GILEAD AND PREMIER TO VIOLATE THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND IS OTHERWISE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 3/31/2022. 3/31/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
