PARKER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| ERICA PARKER |
| SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, STAFFING PLUS HOLDINGS, INC, INTERCOMMUNITY, ACTION INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2017cv01744 |
| April 17, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
CIVIL JUDGMENT ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DEFENDANTS INTERACT, MS. STARK AND MS.WACYK (DOC.77), DEFENDANTS SDP AND MR. DENNIS (DOC.78) AND DEFENDANTS STAFFING PLUS AND MS. CLARK ARE GRANTED. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT F ILED BY DEFENDANTS STAFFING PLUS AND MS. CLARK IS DENIED AS MOOT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF ALL DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ERICA PARKER; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 11/21/19. 11/21/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA IS DENIED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY JAMAL B. DENNIS IS DENIED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY STAFFING PLUS HOLDINGS, INC. AND ALISON CLARK IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 10/12/18. 10/15/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
