MCDONALD-WITHERSPOON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
MICHELLE MCDONALD-WITHERSPOON |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHILADELPHIA ADULT PAROLE AND PROBATION DEPARTMENT, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., MHM SERVICES, INC., AMBER E. BROWNE and JEANETTE PALMER |
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. |
MHM SERVICES, INC. |
2:2017cv01914 |
April 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 127 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/25/20. 8/26/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, ) |
Filing 60 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FILED BY THE CITY DEFENDANTS (DOC. 32 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE MOTION FILED BY BROWNE AND PALMER (DOC. 33 ) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE MOTIO N FILED BY PAPP (DOC. 39 ) IS GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE IN ITS ENTRETY. THE MOTION FILED BY CORIZON (DOC. 43 ) IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE MOTION FILED BY MHM AND ITS JANE DOE EMPLOYEES (DOC. 44 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/23/2018. 8/23/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 26 ORDER THAT PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, DKT. NO. 13, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST MHM. UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , AMBER E. BROWNE AND JEANETTE PALMER, DKT. NO. 14, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT PHILADELPHIA ADULT PAROLE AND PROBATION DEPARTMENT, DKT. NO. 15, IT IS O RDERED THAT PAPP'S MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST PAPP. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER ON OR BEFORE 9/15/2017. IF PLAINTIFF FILES AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS THEREAFTER. IF NO AMENDED COMPLAINT IF FILED, DEFENDANTS CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND MHM SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE CLAIMS REMAINING AGAINST THEM ON OR BEFORE 9/29/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/25/17. 8/25/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ti, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.