WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF et al
| JERMAINE WILLIAMS |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, V. LOPEZ and VALASCO |
| 2:2017cv02697 |
| June 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| R. BARCLAY SURRICK |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER RULING AND/OR IN LIMINE TO BE ALLOWED TO PRESENT THE EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY IN REBUTTAL IF RELEVANT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/20/23. 2/21/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER THAT RULING ON THE CITY MOTION (ECF NO.57) IS DEFERRED UNTIL THE COMMENCEMENT OF TRIAL ON 1/17/23. PLAINTIFF'S OMNIBUS MOTION (ECF NO.58) AND PLAINTIFF'S DOC INCIDENT MOTION (ECF NO.61) ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL OF ARGUMENT ON THE ISSUES RAISED IN THESE MOTIONS AT TRIAL; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/15/23. 1/17/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/21/20. 1/21/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 8/22/17. 8/22/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jl, ))
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
