DAHN v. HART et al
| ABEL DAHN |
| SARAH A. HART, JEFFREY HART, LAURA HART, CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUSTIN MONTGOMERY and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2017cv03591 |
| August 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JOHN R. PADOVA |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY SARAH A. HART (DOC. 20) IS GRANTED. THE 42 U.S.C. 1983 CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST SARAH A. HART IN THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND THE STATE LAW CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST S ARAH A. HART ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF REASSERTING THEM IN STATE COURT. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW HIS CLAIMS AGAINST JEFFERY AND LAURA HART IS GRANTED AND THOSE CLAIMS ARE HEREBY WITHDRAWN. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY JEFFR EY AND LAURA HART (DOC. 21) IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DETECTIVE JUSTIN MONTGOMERY (DOC. 23) IS GRANTED. THE 1983 CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DETECTIVE MONTGOMERY ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT CURES THE DEFICIENCIES IN HIS CLAIMS AGAINST DETECTIVE JUSTIN MONTGOMERY NO LATER THAN 4/19/18. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 3/19/18. 3/19/18 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
