BEY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE 39TH DISTRICT
Plaintiff: LORIE SHARPE BEY
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA POLICE 39TH DISTRICT
Case Number: 2:2017cv04587
Filed: October 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: MARK A. KEARNEY
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ALLOW THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMNEDED COMPLAINT BY 11/27/17; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 11/14/17. 11/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(jl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BEY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE 39TH DISTRICT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LORIE SHARPE BEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA POLICE 39TH DISTRICT
Represented By: TARA FUNG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?