WALKER v. ONEILL et al
| JERRY EUGENE WALKER |
| STEVEN T. ONEILL, MEGHAN LACHEPLLE, MICHAEL R. GORDON, TODD BERGMAN, KATHLEEN SUBBIO, STEPHANIE LANDES, FRANSIC LAWRENCE, JR., MARK TALBOT, ANDREW BIXLER, TIM WILLIAM and EMRICH RAYMOND E., JR. |
| 2:2017cv04973 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED; PLFF. IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS LAWSUIT, WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF HIS ARRESTS, IMPRISONMENT, PROSECUTIONS, OR PAROLE VIO LATIONS. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND PLFF. TWO BLANK FORM COMPLAINTS TO BE USED BY A PRISONER FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION PURSUANT TO 4 2 USC, SECTION 1983. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 12/6/17. 12/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF. AND WARDEN OF THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. (pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
