THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. MAZZA et al
| THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON |
| MARK D. MAZZA and LISA A. MAZZA |
| 2:2017cv05453 |
| December 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Chester |
| PETRESE B. TUCKER |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. ALL COUNTERCLAIMS FILED BY DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 52) IS DENIED AS MOOT. 3. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR DISCOVE RY (ECF NO. 54) IS DENIED. 4. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO VACATE (ECF NO. 55) IS DENIED. 5. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSEDDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/24/23. 5/24/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND E-MAILED.(jaa, ) Modified on 5/24/2023 (jaa, ).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO REASSIGN THIS CASE TO JUDGE TUCKER IS DENIED; 2. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO VACATE THE CHIEF JUDGES ORDER OF JULY 22, 2022 IS DENIED; AND 3. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECUSAL/DISQUALIFICATION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 144 AND 28 U.S.C. § 455 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 9/22/22. 9/23/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. *NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES. (jaa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
