COVENANT PARTNERS, L.P. et al v. FRETZ et al
| GARY F. SEITZ |
| WILLIAM B. FRETZ, JR. and JOHN P. FREEMAN |
| 2:2017mc00052 |
| April 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| JOEL H. SLOMSKY |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTSWILLIAM B. FRETZ, JR. AND JOHN P. FREEMAN AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF GARY F. SEITZ, AS CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF DEBTOR COVENANT PARTNERS, L.P., ON PLAINTIFFS ADVERSARY COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (BANKRUPTCY ADVERSARY NO. 16-00226, DOC. NO. 1 ). DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) OFFERS OF SETTLEMENT (BANKRUPTCY ADVERSARY NO. 16-00226, DOC. NO. 64 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR EVIDENCE FROM THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND EVIDENCE OF THE TRUSTEES DAMAGES (BANKRUPTCY ADVERSARY NO. 16-00226, DOC. NO. 66 ) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE FRORER HEARSAY STATEMENTS (BANKRUPTCY ADVERSARY NO. 16-00226, DOC. NO. 68 ) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/13/18. 9/14/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
