IN RE: APPLICATION OF BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1782 FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH |
2:2017mc00158 |
September 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
Other |
Foreign Deposition |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO QUASH (DOC. NO. 7 ), IS GRANTED. THE SUBPOENA SERVED BY BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND ON ESSCHEM, INC.'S LITIGATION COUNSEL (GREENBERG TAURIG, LLP AND FINEMAN KREKSTEIN & HARRIS P.C.), IS QUASHED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/21/2017. 11/22/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: IN RE: APPLICATION OF BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1782 FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH | |
Represented By: | CALLI JO PADILLA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.