IN RE: APPLICATION OF BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1782 FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
Petitioner: BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH
Case Number: 2:2017mc00158
Filed: September 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Foreign Deposition
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO QUASH (DOC. NO. 7 ), IS GRANTED. THE SUBPOENA SERVED BY BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND ON ESSCHEM, INC.'S LITIGATION COUNSEL (GREENBERG TAURIG, LLP AND FINEMAN KREKSTEIN & HARRIS P.C.), IS QUASHED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/21/2017. 11/22/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IN RE: APPLICATION OF BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1782 FOR AN ORDER TO TAKE DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BIOMET ORTHOPAEDICS SWITZERLAND GMBH
Represented By: CALLI JO PADILLA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?