MORGAN et al v. RCL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
| SHASHAY MORGAN, WILLIAM THOMAS VEASY and AMAL IBRAHIM |
| RCL MANAGEMENT, LLC, BAHAA DAWARA and IMAD DAWARA |
| 2:2018cv00800 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS ARE ENTITLED TO DAMAGES, FEES, AND COSTS AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFF SHASHAY MORGAN IS AWARDED $20,300.00 IN UNPAID WAGES; $3,806.25 IN OVERTIME WAGES; AND $24,106.25 IN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. CUMULATIVELY, PLAINTIFF MORGAN IS AWARDED $48,212.50. PLAINTIFF IMAL IBRAHIM IS AWARDED $11,600.00 IN UNPAID WAGES; $2,175.00 IN OVERTIME WAGES; AND $13,775.00 IN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. CUMULATIVELY, PLAINTIFF IBRAHIM IS AWARDED $27,550.00. P LAINTIFF WILLIAM THOMAS VEASY IS AWARDED $16,240.00 IN UNPAID WAGES; $3,045.00 IN OVERTIME WAGES; AND $19,285 IN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. CUMULATIVELY, PLAINTIFF IBRAHIM IS AWARDED $38,570.00. PLAINTIFFS ARE ALSO AWARDED ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR A TOTAL OF $20,765.73. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS ACTION AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/23/20. 6/23/20 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
