BEY v. STATE FARM JOHN DOE 1-13 ET AL

BEY v. STATE FARM JOHN DOE 1-13 ET AL

Plaintiff:	PATRICIA BEY
Defendant:	STATE FARM JOHN DOE 1-13 ET AL
Case Number:	2:2018cv00948
Filed:	March 5, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	GERALD J. PAPPERT
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 10, 2018	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO AMEND THE CAPTION IN THIS MATTER TO REFLECT THAT THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES, OUTLINED HEREIN, ARE THE NAMED DEFENDANTS. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. BEY'S CLAIMS CHALLENG ING THE DISPOSITION OF HER STATE CASE ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. HER CLAIMS PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1983 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BEY MAY NOT AMEND HER COMPLAINT AGAIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/10/2018. 4/10/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas)
March 8, 2018	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. BEY IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. FURTHER INFORMATION OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/8/2018. 3/8/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH COMPLAINT FORM.(amas)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 10, 2018

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO AMEND THE CAPTION IN THIS MATTER TO REFLECT THAT THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES, OUTLINED HEREIN, ARE THE NAMED DEFENDANTS. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. BEY'S CLAIMS CHALLENG ING THE DISPOSITION OF HER STATE CASE ARE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. HER CLAIMS PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. SEC. 1983 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BEY MAY NOT AMEND HER COMPLAINT AGAIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 4/10/2018. 4/10/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas)

March 8, 2018

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. BEY IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. FURTHER INFORMATION OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 3/8/2018. 3/8/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH COMPLAINT FORM.(amas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BEY v. STATE FARM JOHN DOE 1-13 ET AL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICIA BEY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STATE FARM JOHN DOE 1-13 ET AL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?