TALBERT v. CARNEY et al
Plaintiff: CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant: BLANCHE CARNEY, GERALD MAY and TERRANCE CLARK
Case Number: 2:2018cv01620
Filed: April 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: MARK A. KEARNEY
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 191 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT FORD'S MOTION TO STRIKE (DOC. NO 173) IS GRANTED; WE STRIKE PARAGRAPHS 6, 19-21, 23-26 AND 28-30 OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 61) TO THE EXTENT THEY REFER TO OFFICER FORD; WE DISMISS OFFICER FORD AS PLAINITFF FAILS TO SHOW IMMINENT DANGER EXEMPTING HIM FROM THE THREE STRIKES RULE UNDER THE PRISONER LITIGATION REFORM ACT BUT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO TIMELY FILING A NEW CASE AND PAYING THE REQUIRED FEES; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/10/19. 10/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
August 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 141 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 08/13/2019. 08/13/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(nd, )
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. NO. 94 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/1/2019. 7/1/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 25) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 10/3/18. 10/4/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
July 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 12 IS GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PRO SE PLAINTIFF FILING AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 8/20/18 COMPLIANT WITH FRCP 11 AND THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/20/18. 7/20/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO TALBERT. (fdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TALBERT v. CARNEY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES TALBERT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BLANCHE CARNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GERALD MAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERRANCE CLARK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?