BROWN v. OVERMYER et al
ANTHONY BROWN |
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2018cv02967 |
July 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
MARILYN HEFFLEY |
GERALD J PAPPERT |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE by MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA re #5 MOTION to Modify Briefing Schedule [pending Petitioner's filing of supporting memorandum of law] (Amended Certificate of Service re new prison mailing procedures) (GOLDWERT, JOSHUA) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT PETITIONER SHALL FILE ON OR BEFORE 10/8/18 A MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS PETITION. WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW, RESPONDENTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSE THAT CONFORMS WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER OF 8/6/18 (DOC. NO. 4) AND WITH RULE 5 OF THE RULES GOVERNING SECTION 2254 CASES IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURTS. IF PETITIONER FAILS TO SERVE A REVISED PETITION OR A SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON OR BEFORE 10/8/18, RESPONDENTS SHALL FILE THEIR RESPONSE TO THE EXISTING PETITION ON OR BEFORE 10/26/18. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 9/6/18. 9/7/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Modify Briefing Schedule [pending Petitioner's filing of supporting memorandum of law] filed by MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA.Certificate of Service.Motions referred to MARILYN HEFFLEY.(GOLDWERT, JOSHUA) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER, WITH EXHIBITS ATTACHED, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. ANTHONY BROWN, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,CP-51-CR-0002243-2011 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 10/5/2018.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 8/6/18. 8/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS, AND E-MAILED TO CCP-PHILA. COUNTY.(pr, ) |
Mailed petition, docket, and order dated 8/6/18 to D.A.-Philadelphia County, respondent, PA Attorney General (Harrisburg & Phila.) (pr, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE D.A.-PHILADELPHIA COUNTY WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/3/18. 8/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO D.A.-PHILA. COUNTY.(pr, ) Modified on 8/6/2018 (pr, ). |
E-mailed petition, docket, and order dated 8/3/18 to D.A.-Philadelphia County. (pr, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 181633.), filed by ANTHONY BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.