LEANIER v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF et al
ALDEN LEANIER |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF |
2:2018cv02968 |
July 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PETITIONER'S PETITION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE;; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH A NEW APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254 ; PETITIONER SHALL FILE AN AMENDED PETITION NO LATER THAN 10/15/18. PETITIONER SHALL EITHER REMIT THE $5.00 FILING FEE OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/14/18. 8/15/18 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND FORMS MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ALDEN LEANIER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY ALDEN LEANIER.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.