JOHNSON v. ALDI INC. et al
THEMA JOHNSON |
ALDI INC., KYLE GOLDEN AND ITS AGENTS & ATTORNEY and CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT SUC. INC. (CCMSI) |
2:2018cv03204 |
July 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. THE DISMISSAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO JOHNSON'S RIGHT TO REFILE HER CLAIMS IN STATE COURT. JOHNSON MAY NOT FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/2/2018. 8/2/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/2/2018. 8/2/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ALDI INC., CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT SUC. INC. (CCMSI), KYLE GOLDEN AND ITS AGENTS & ATTORNEY, filed by THEMA JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY THEMA JOHNSON.(ahf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by THEMA JOHNSON. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.