AMOLLO v. MORRIS & ADELMAN, P.C. et al
| REUBEN AMOLLO |
| MORRIS & ADELMAN, P.C. and GALAXY ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC |
| 2:2018cv03301 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| C DARNELL JONES |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT UPON THE DEFENDANTS AT NO COST TO AMOLLO, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 8/7/18.8/7/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ti, )
|
| Summons Issued as to GALAXY ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, MORRIS & ADELMAN, P.C. Two (2) Originals Forwarded To: US Marshals on 8/7/18 (ti, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against GALAXY ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, MORRIS & ADELMAN, P.C., filed by REUBEN AMOLLO.(jwl, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/6/2018) (jwl, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by REUBEN AMOLLO..(jwl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by REUBEN AMOLLO. (jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
