LAPPING et al v. CIACELLI et al
LAURE A. LAPPING and SCOTT D. LIGHT |
MARK L. CIACELLI and SANDRA CIACELLI |
2:2018cv03308 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Bucks |
EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing: ARBITRATION HEARING SET FOR 1/24/2019 09:30 AM IN Philadelphia.(ahf) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint together with with Affirmative Defenses by MARK L. CIACELLI, SANDRA CIACELLI.(HADDICK, CHARLES) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SANDRA CIACELLI. SANDRA CIACELLI waiver sent on 8/10/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (HADDICK, CHARLES) |
Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MARK L. CIACELLI. MARK L. CIACELLI waiver sent on 8/10/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (HADDICK, CHARLES) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARK L. CIACELLI, SANDRA CIACELLI ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 182633.), filed by LAURE A. LAPPING, SCOTT D. LIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(ahf) |
Case Eligible for Arbitration(ahf) |
Summons Issued as to MARK L. CIACELLI, SANDRA CIACELLI. 2 Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/6/2018 (ahf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by LAURE A. LAPPING, SCOTT D. LIGHT. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.