RYTSAR v. HAINSWORTH et al
Petitioner: VLADIMIR RYTSAR
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MELISSA HAINSWORTH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS
Case Number: 2:2018cv03326
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Bucks
Presiding Judge: NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Filing 6 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PETITON FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 9/13/18. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Civ 623) 9/14/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd, )
September 5, 2018 Filing 5 ***(Court Only) Civ624 Notice to the Court regarding Report and Recommendation.(pr, )
August 17, 2018 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUCIE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Civ 623) 8/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd, )
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERD THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PETITION TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 8/13/18. 8/14/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF PETITION TO BUCKS COUNYTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY. (jpd )
August 13, 2018 COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET SHEET FORWARDED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY. (jpd, )
August 6, 2018 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf)
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (No Fee, No IFP), filed by VLADIMIR RYTSAR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets, #2 Envelope)(ahf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RYTSAR v. HAINSWORTH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: VLADIMIR RYTSAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?