HICKS v. GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC.
PHILIP HICKS |
GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. |
2:2018cv03470 |
August 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
BERLE M SCHILLER |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE JOINT #6 MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 12/10/07 IS GRANTED AND, PURSUANT TO FRCP 55(C) AND 60(B), THE 9/28/18 DEFAULT IS HEREBY SET ASIDE, AND DEFENDANT SHALL HAVE 20 DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 10/9/18.10/10/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Set Aside Default Judgment Order Dated September 28, 2018 filed by GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC..Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(BATISTA, KATHARINE) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Set Aside Default Judgment Order Dated December 10, 2007 filed by GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC..Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(BATISTA, KATHARINE) Modified on 10/9/2018 (lvj, ). (ATTORNEY FILED IN ERROR; WILL RE-FILE CORRECT DOCUMENT) |
Default Entered. (fdc) (DEFAULT SET ASIDE PURSUANT TO JUDGE SCHILLER'S ORDER OF 10/10/18 #7 ) Modified 10/10/18 (fdc). |
DEFAULT BY GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND. (fdc) (DEFAULT SET ASIDE PURSUANT TO JUDGE SCHILLER'S ORDER OF 10/10/18 #7 ) Modified 10/10/18 (fdc). |
Filing 4 Request for Default Against Defendant Grapevine Visual Concepts, Inc. for failure to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint PHILIP HICKS against GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC.. (GOLD, SIDNEY) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PHILIP HICKS re: Ron Stein served Summons and Complaint upon GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. by Personal Service. GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. served on 9/4/2018, answer due 9/25/2018. (va, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by TRACI M. GREENBERG on behalf of PHILIP HICKS (GREENBERG, TRACI) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 183234.), filed by PHILIP HICKS.(ahf) |
Summons Issued as to GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC.. 1 Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/16/2018 (ahf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by PHILIP HICKS. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HICKS v. GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PHILIP HICKS | |
Represented By: | SIDNEY L. GOLD |
Represented By: | TRACI M. GREENBERG |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GRAPEVINE VISUAL CONCEPTS, INC. | |
Represented By: | KATHARINE THOMAS BATISTA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.