HENWOOD et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY
| JANE HENWOOD and JOHN HENWOOD |
| MONSANTO COMPANY |
| 2:2018cv03496 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Original record transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California via inter-district transfer system. (fb) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order (CTO - 100) transferring this action to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of 10/3/16, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. (mbh, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by BRIAN J. MCCORMICK, JR on behalf of JANE HENWOOD, JOHN HENWOOD with Certificate of Service(MCCORMICK, BRIAN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MONSANTO COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 183306.), filed by JOHN HENWOOD, JANE HENWOOD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form, #4 Case Management Track Form)(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JANE HENWOOD, JOHN HENWOOD. (ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to MONSANTO COMPANY. 1 Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/17/2018 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
