DAVIS v. SINGLE EYE PRODUCTIONS LLC et al
| JESSICA DAVIS |
| EDMUND HAMMOND, PATRICK LOBO, ABDUL MUSED 1234 LLC, PSI UPSILON, CHEEKY WINSTON, LLC, PSI UPSILON INTERNATIONAL OFFICE, VADIM ORDOVSKY-TANAEVSKY and SINGLE EYE PRODUCTIONS LLC |
| 2:2018cv04050 |
| September 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 10/1/18. 10/1/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
| Filing 2 To Withdraw Complaint without Prejudice by JESSICA DAVIS. (BOYLAN, KEVIN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABDUL MUSED 1234 LLC, CHEEKY WINSTON, LLC, EDMUND HAMMOND, PATRICK LOBO, VADIM ORDOVSKY-TANAEVSKY, PSI UPSILON, PSI UPSILON INTERNATIONAL OFFICE, SINGLE EYE PRODUCTIONS LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 185001.), filed by JESSICA DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JESSICA DAVIS. (ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to ABDUL MUSED 1234 LLC, CHEEKY WINSTON, LLC, EDMUND HAMMOND, PATRICK LOBO, VADIM ORDOVSKY-TANAEVSKY, PSI UPSILON, PSI UPSILON INTERNATIONAL OFFICE, SINGLE EYE PRODUCTIONS LLC. 8 Forwarded To: Counsel on 9/20/2018 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
