JONES v. GENERAL GEORGE G. MEADE SCHOOL et al
SIERRA JONES |
FRIDA, ANDREW WHITE, GENERAL GEORGE G. MEADE SCHOOL, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and DONNA SMITH |
2:2018cv04148 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PETRESE B TUCKER |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SIERRA JONES re: JAMES DAVIS served Summons and Complaint upon FRIDA, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA by PERSONAL. FRIDA served on 10/8/2018, answer due 10/29/2018; THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA served on 10/5/2018, answer due 10/26/2018. (amas) |
Filing 3 3 Summons Returned Unexecuted by SIERRA JONES as to GENERAL GEORGE G. MEADE SCHOOL, DONNA SMITH, ANDREW WHITE. (amas) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW B. WEISBERG on behalf of SIERRA JONES with Certificate of Service and Jury Demand(WEISBERG, MATTHEW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FRIDA, GENERAL GEORGE G. MEADE SCHOOL, DONNA SMITH, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW WHITE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 185267.), filed by SIERRA JONES.(amas) |
5 Summons Issued as to FRIDA, GENERAL GEORGE G. MEADE SCHOOL, DONNA SMITH, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW WHITE. Forwarded To: PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 9/27/2018 (amas) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SIERRA JONES. (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.