AQUARO v. MARTIN et al
MARTINO AQUARO |
JOSEPH MARTIN and H. P. KANADY, INC. |
2:2018cv04154 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
J CURTIS JOYNER |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MARTINO AQUARO re served summons and complaint upon H. P. KANADY, INC. by Certified Mail.(GALLAGHER, MATTHEW) Modified on 11/1/2018 (lisad, ). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MARTINO AQUARO re served summons and complaint upon JOSEPH MARTIN by Certified Mail. (GALLAGHER, MATTHEW) Modified on 11/1/2018 (lisad, ). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MARTINO AQUARO re served summons and complaint upon JOSEPH MARTIN by Certified Mail. (GALLAGHER, MATTHEW) Modified on 11/1/2018 (lisad, ). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW E. GALLAGHER on behalf of MARTINO AQUARO (GALLAGHER, MATTHEW) |
Case Eligible for Arbitration(ahf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against H. P. KANADY, INC., JOSEPH MARTIN ( Filing fee $400.00 receipt number PPE185274.), filed by PLFF MARTINO AQUARO. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheets)(kw, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by PLFF MARTINO AQUARO. (kw, ) |
(2) Summons Issued as to H. P. KANADY, INC., JOSEPH MARTIN. Forwarded To: counsel on 9/28/18. (kw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.