HSU V KIRSTJEN NIELSON, ET AL.
Plaintiff: HU CHI HSU
Defendant: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL BORGEN, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN and L. FRANCIS CISSNA
Case Number: 2:2018cv04241
Filed: October 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: R BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(II). SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 11/27/18. 11/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
November 27, 2018 Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal by KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, MICHAEL BORGEN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN. (AMOROSA, JUDITH)
October 12, 2018 Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (rf, )
October 3, 2018 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service re: served summons upon Kirstjen Nielsen, Lee Francis Cissna, Kathleen Bausman, Michael Borgen, US Attorney's Office, Jeff Sessions by Certified Mail on 10/2/2018 (HYKEL-CUDDY, RENEE)
October 2, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS FOR FAILURE TO ADJUDICATE I-485, APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS OR ADJUST STATUS against KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, MICHAEL BORGEN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE185657.), filed by HU CHI HSU., VERIFICATION (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(rf, )
October 2, 2018 5 Original Summons Issued as to KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, MICHAEL BORGEN, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN forwarded to Plaintiffs' Counsel. 1 Summons to US Attorney for Service. (rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HSU V KIRSTJEN NIELSON, ET AL.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIRSTJEN NIELSEN
Represented By: JUDITH A. AMOROSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL BORGEN
Represented By: JUDITH A. AMOROSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHLEEN BAUSMAN
Represented By: JUDITH A. AMOROSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. FRANCIS CISSNA
Represented By: JUDITH A. AMOROSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HU CHI HSU
Represented By: RENEE HYKEL CUDDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?