MYSHKIN v. SESSIONS et al
| ANDREY MYSHKIN |
| KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, JEFFERSON SESSIONS, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN and FRANCIS L. CISSNA |
| 2:2018cv04246 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| J CURTIS JOYNER |
| Immigration: Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Second MOTION to Dismiss with corrected Certificate of Service filed by ANDREY MYSHKIN.Motion to Voluntary Dismiss.(SOLOW, ADAM) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by ANDREY MYSHKIN.Motion to Voluntary Dismiss.(SOLOW, ADAM) Modified on 11/26/2018 (fb). |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL SHOW CAUSE, IF ANY THEY HAVE, WHY THE PRAYER OF THE WITHIN PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE ENTRY DATE OF THIS ORDER. DEFENDANTS ARE ADVISED THAT THE FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THIS ORDER SHALL RESULT IN THE PRAYER OF THE PLAINTIFF'S PETITION BE GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 11/19/18. 11/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by ANDREY MYSHKIN.(jl, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION by ANDREY MYSHKIN FOR HEARING ON NATURALIZATION APPLICATION UNDER 8 U.S.C. & 1447 (B), CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 CASE FORMS)(jl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
