WHIPPLE v. GOVAN et al
| RUBYE WHIPPLE |
| SETH GOVAN and SEAN P. WHALEN |
| 2:2018cv04284 |
| October 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT by RUBYE WHIPPLE. (ti, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT AND NOTICE OF REMOVAL ARE DEEMED FILED. WITH RESPECT TO CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4325, CASE NO. 180602091 IS REMANDED FORTHWITH. THE COMPLAINT IN CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-4284 IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THESE CASES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 11/6/18. 11/7/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ti, )
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 11/6/18. 11/7/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ti, ) |
| Filing 4 EXHIBIT by RUBYE WHIPPLE. (ti, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SETH GOVAN, SEAN P. WHALEN, filed by RUBYE WHIPPLE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY RUBYE WHIPPLE.(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by RUBYE WHIPPLE. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
