ALSHARQI et al v. POMPEO et al
| MUSHRIQ ALSHARQI and ROSUL ALSHARQI |
| MICHAEL POMPEO, JEFFREY SESSIONS, III, CARL RISCH, DOUGLAS STILLMAN and KIRSTJEN NIELSEN |
| 2:2018cv04366 |
| October 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| BERLE M SCHILLER |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED FROM 12/11/18 TP 1/25/19. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 12/6/18. 12/7/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
| Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (mbh, ) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by MUSHRIQ ALSHARQI, ROSUL ALSHARQI.(ahf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus against KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL POMPEO, CARL RISCH, JEFFREY SESSIONS, III, DOUGLAS STILLMAN ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 186069.), filed by ROSUL ALSHARQI, MUSHRIQ ALSHARQI.(ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL POMPEO, CARL RISCH, JEFFREY SESSIONS, III, DOUGLAS STILLMAN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General 6 Forwarded To: Counsel & 1 to AUSA on 10/11/2018 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
