CARRINGTON v. DELBALSO et al
| CHARLES CARRINGTON |
| TERESA DELBALSO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA. |
| 2:2018cv04801 |
| November 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY R RICE |
| JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Order dated 11/20/2018 and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to Charles Carrington for the following reason: Unable to Forward. (dt) |
| Copy of Order dated 11/29/2018 and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to CHARLES CARRINGTON for the following reason: REFUSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD. (kk, ) |
| Mailed Order dated 11/20/18 Charles Carrington to correct address. (er, ) |
| Copy of Order dated 11/20/18 and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to CHARLES CARRINGTON for the following reason: RETURN TO SENDER - DOES NOT FOLLOW PA DOC MAIL. (er, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT BY 2/27/19, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER. BY 2/27/19, THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. CARRINGTON, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,CP-51-CR-10404-2007. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 2/27/2019.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 11/29/18. 11/30/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, RESPONDENT, D.A.-PHILADELPHIA COUNTY AND E-MAILED CCP-PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.(pr, )
|
| Mailed docket, petition, and order dated 11/29/18 to D.A.-Philadelphia County, respondent, PA Attorney General (Harrisburg & Phila.) (pr, ) |
| Copy of Notice of Guidelines for appearing pro se, receipt, copy of petition dated 11/5/18 and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to CHARLES CARRINGTON for the following reason: Return to sender, refused, unable to forward, Mail does not follow PA DOC mail policy. (Re-mailed to CHARLES CARRINGTON, HS-1233, SCI MAHANOY, SMART COMMUNICATIONS DOC/PA, PO BOX 33028, ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33733) (pr, ) Modified on 11/28/2018 (pr, ). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. RICE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND THAT NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 11/20/18. 11/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER. (er, )
|
| E-mailed docket, order and petition to Philadelphia DA. (er, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 187558.), filed by CHARLES CARRINGTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
