HOUCK v. JANSSEN SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS et al
| JAMES E. HOUCK |
| JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and JANSSEN SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS |
| 2:2018cv04830 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT HOUCK'S MOTON FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IF HOUCK SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE IS DIRECTED TO, WITHIN 30 DAYS, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT AS OUTLINED HEREIN, OR SUBMIT $400.00 TO THE CLERK OF COURT. IF HOUCK IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS, EVEN IF HIS CASE IS DISMISSD, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/9/2018.11/13/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS, filed by JAMES E. HOUCK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) (Main Document 2 replaced on 11/8/2018) (nd, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY JAMES E. HOUCK.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
