MARANT v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: SHARON MARANT
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2018cv04832
Filed: November 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH T HEY
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2019 Filing 9 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (rf, )
December 11, 2018 Filing 8 Procedural Order 12/20/18 Entered and copies e-mailed. (va, )
December 11, 2018 3 Summonses and Copies of Complaint Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL. Forwarded To: US MARSHAL (2) and US ATTY (1) on 12/20/18. (va, ) Modified on 12/20/2018 (va, ).
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE US MARSHAL SHALL SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 12/11/18. 12/12/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by SHARON MARANT. (SAVOY, ROBERT) Modified on 12/11/2018 (md).
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS INDICATING HER PAY PERIODS. ALTHOUGH PLAINTIFF HAS INDICATED WHAT HER GROSS AND NET WAGES ARE AND INDICATED THAT SHE RECEIVES A DISABILITY PENSION, SHE HAS FAILED TO INDICATE HOW FREQUENTLY SHE RECEIVES THESE PAYMENTS. WITHIN 20 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF SHALL COMPLETE THE APPLICATION INDICATING THE FREQUENCY OF THESE PAYMENTS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 12/3/18. 12/3/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
November 21, 2018 Filing 4 Social Security Magistrate Consent by SHARON MARANT.. (SAVOY, ROBERT)
November 7, 2018 Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(amas) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/9/2018) (amas).
November 7, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by SHARON MARANT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas)
November 7, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHARON MARANT.(amas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARANT v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHARON MARANT
Represented By: ROBERT SAVOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?