ACOSTA v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: OMAYRA ACOSTA
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2018cv04943
Filed: November 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: BERLE M SCHILLER
Referring Judge: CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2018 Filing 9 US Marshal Return Re:Summons and Complaint served by FedEx. (kp, )
November 20, 2018 Filing 8 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (kp, )
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER FOR DIRECT ASSIGNMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES PILOT PROGRAM AND PLAINTIFF HAVING DECLINED CONSENT, THIS CASE IS RANDOMLY REASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 11/20/2018. 11/20/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
November 20, 2018 Filing 6 Social Security Declining Magistrate Consent by OMAYRA ACOSTA.. (SAVOY, ROBERT)
November 16, 2018 Filing 5 Social Security Procedural Order 11/16/2018 Entered and copies e-mailed. (kp, )
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT UPON THE DEFENDANT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS ON 11/16/2018.11/16/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
November 16, 2018 3 Summons Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. 2 Forwarded To: US MARSHAL, 1 TO U.S ATTORNEY on 11/16/2018 (kp, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(kp, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by OMAYRA ACOSTA.(IFP PENDING) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kp, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by OMAYRA ACOSTA..(kp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ACOSTA v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OMAYRA ACOSTA
Represented By: ROBERT SAVOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?