RIVERS v. CROZER-KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM et al
| TAMEKA RIVERS |
| CROZER-KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM and PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. |
| 2:2018cv04972 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| CYNTHIA M RUFE |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TAMEKA RIVERS. CROZER-KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM waiver sent on 11/27/2018, answer due 1/26/2019. (VANCE, ROBERT) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TAMEKA RIVERS. PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. waiver sent on 11/27/2018, answer due 1/26/2019. (VANCE, ROBERT) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by TRACY A. WALSH on behalf of CROZER-KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM, PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service(WALSH, TRACY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CROZER-KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM, PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 188048.), filed by TAMEKA RIVERS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
| 2 Summons Issued as to CROZER-KEYSTONE HEALTH SYSTEM, PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.. Forwarded To: PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 11/16/2018 (amas) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by TAMEKA RIVERS. (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
