SMITH et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
Plaintiff: CHARLES SMITH and VENITA SMITH
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
In Re: ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Case Number: 2:2018cv05001
Filed: November 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: HARVEY BARTLE
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO)
November 26, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by TIMOTHY MICHAEL MORGAN on behalf of CHARLES SMITH, VENITA SMITH with Certificate of Service(MORGAN, TIMOTHY)
November 26, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL S. GOETZ on behalf of CHARLES SMITH, VENITA SMITH with Certificate of Service(GOETZ, MICHAEL)
November 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE188110.), filed by CHARLES SMITH, VENITA SMITH., JURY TRIAL DEMAND. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(rf, )
November 19, 2018 2 Original Summons Issued as to MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP forwarded to Plaintiffs' Counsel on 11/19/18. (rf, )
November 19, 2018 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CHARLES SMITH, VENITA SMITH. (rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES SMITH
Represented By: Nicole Marie Georges
Represented By: TIMOTHY MICHAEL MORGAN
Represented By: MICHAEL S. GOETZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VENITA SMITH
Represented By: Nicole Marie Georges
Represented By: TIMOTHY MICHAEL MORGAN
Represented By: MICHAEL S. GOETZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Represented By: DINO S. SANGIAMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC.
Represented By: DINO S. SANGIAMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?