ELLIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| SYLVESTER ELLIS |
| SEARGENT A. LEBESCO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O. MURRAY, JOHN DOE #1, LIEUTENANT S. GOLDEN-DEVAUX, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER S. GRANT, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER M. CARASQUERO, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER R. EURE, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, WARDEN JOHN DELANEY, WARDEN CATHY TALMADGE, CAPTAIN R. ROSE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER S. BATES and COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY |
| 2:2018cv05046 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SYLVESTER ELLIS. All Defendants. (ALI, ZAINAB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against S. BATES, M. CARASQUERO, BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DELANEY, R. EURE, MICHELE FARRELL, S. GOLDEN-DEVAUX, S. GRANT, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3, A. LEBESCO, O. MURRAY, R. ROSE, CATHY TALMADGE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 188235.), filed by SYLVESTER ELLIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to S. BATES, M. CARASQUERO, BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DELANEY, R. EURE, MICHELE FARRELL, S. GOLDEN-DEVAUX, S. GRANT, A. LEBESCO, O. MURRAY, R. ROSE, CATHY TALMADGE. 13 Forwarded To: Counsel on 11/21/2018 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
