PONZO v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI-CHESTER et al
LEROY PONZO |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and SUPERINTENDENT SCI-CHESTER |
2:2018cv05154 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order dated 11/30/2018 and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to LEROY PONZO for the following reason: REFUSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD. (kk, ) |
Copy of Order dated 12/6/2018 and envelope returned from the U.S. Postal Service addressed to LEROY PONZO for the following reason: REFUSED - UNABLE TO FORWARD. (kk, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED AS MOOT; THE INSTANT PETITION (DOC. NO. 2) IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 12/4/18.12/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (pr, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LEROY PONZO. (ahf) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LEROY PONZO. BRIEF. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY LEROY PONZO.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.