DOE v. RISQUE VIDEO, INC. et al
| Jane Doe |
| DEAN PAGANO, RISQUE VIDEO, INC. and THEODORE PAGANO |
| 2:2018cv05195 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THE TIME IN WHICH DEFTS MAY RESPOND TO PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED 60 DAYS OR UNTIL 3/29/2019, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 1/24/19. 1/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by RISQUE VIDEO, INC..(SCAFARIA, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JEFFREY M. SCAFARIA on behalf of DEAN PAGANO, THEODORE PAGANO, RISQUE VIDEO, INC. with Certificate of Service(SCAFARIA, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Robert Campbell re: served Summons and Complaint upon Theodore Pagano by Personal Service Upon Individual on 1/7/2019 (MILLER, CAROLINE) |
| Summons Issued as to DEAN PAGANO, THEODORE PAGANO, RISQUE VIDEO, INC.. Three Forwarded To: Counsel on 12/4/18 (jwl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JANE DOE. (jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEAN PAGANO, THEODORE PAGANO, RISQUE VIDEO, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-13205674.), filed by Jane Doe.(MILLER, CAROLINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
