PAYNE v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
| LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR. |
| ARAMARK CORP., ANTHONY FRANKLIN, MARY BROWN, JAMES and JUDY CHAPMAN |
| 2:2018cv05201 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PETRESE B TUCKER |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER 60B filed by LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR..(va, ) |
| Letter mailed to pro se party regarding transfer of case. (pr, ) |
| Original record transferred to the Northern District of Ohio via interdistrict transfer system. (md) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER FORTHWITH THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHALL BE LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE TRANSFEREE COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 12/5/18. 12/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., 1 COPY TO STATS DEPT. (pr, )
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ARAMARK CORP., MARY BROWN, JUDY CHAPMAN, ANTHONY FRANKLIN, JAMES, filed by LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwl, ) Modified on 12/4/2018 (md). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR..(jwl, ) Modified on 12/4/2018 (md). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
