JACOBS v. KING et al
Plaintiff: EUGENE JACOBS
Defendant: RICHARD CARROLL and ROGER KING
Case Number: 2:2018cv05415
Filed: December 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JEFFREY L SCHMEHL
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER THAT THE #9 MOTION IS DENIED AS MOOT BECAUSE JACOBS HAS ALREADY NOTIFIED THE COURT OF HIS INTENT TO DISMISS THIS CASE AND THE COURT HAS ALREADY DISMISSED THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (SEE ECF NO. #8 ). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/7/19.2/7/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas, )
January 28, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS CIVIL ACTION FILED BY EUGENE JACOBS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE.(er, )
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER THAT THE COURT CONSTRUES JACOB'S LETTER AS A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND, IN ACCORDANCE WITH JACOB'S REQUEST TO DISMISS HIS CASE, THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/23/19. 1/24/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF. (pr, )
January 22, 2019 Filing 7 Letter from Eugene Jacobs. Re: Dismissing his complaint. (er, )
January 22, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by EUGENE JACOBS.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. (Attachments: #1 ENVELOPE)(er, )
January 22, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME FOR FILING PETITION FOR CIVIL ACTION filed by EUGENE JACOBS. (er, )
January 22, 2019 Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by EUGENE JACOBS. (er, )
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT IN THE EVENT JACOBS SEEKS TO CHALLENGE THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF HIS CONVICTION AND SEEKS RELEASE FROM IMPRISONMENT ON THAT BASIS, HE MAY SEEK TO FILE AN APPLICATION WITH THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2244, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/18/18. 12/18/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(er, )
December 14, 2018 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, )
December 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD CARROLL, ROGER KING, filed by EUGENE JACOBS. NO FEE. NO IFP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JACOBS v. KING et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD CARROLL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROGER KING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EUGENE JACOBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?