MCKEOWN v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
PAUL MCKEOWN |
UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION |
2:2018cv05480 |
December 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
R BARCLAY SURRICK |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 2/25/19 AT 2:00 PM IN CHAMBERS (ROOM 8614) BEFORE HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK.SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/11/19. 2/11/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION.(SCHWEIZER, CAROLYN) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PAUL MCKEOWN re: Tracy Watson served Summons and Complaint upon UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION by Certified Mail. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION served on 12/28/2018, answer due 1/18/2019. (SIMON, MARC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by CAROLYN MICHELLE SCHWEIZER on behalf of UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (SCHWEIZER, CAROLYN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 189694.), filed by PAUL MCKEOWN.(ahf) |
Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION. 1 Forwarded To: Counsel on 12/20/2018 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.