CRISTAL v. SYNCHRONY BANK et al
Plaintiff: STEPHEN CRISTAL
Defendant: LOWE'S and SYNCHRONY BANK
Case Number: 2:2018cv05535
Filed: December 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: R BARCLAY SURRICK
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLFF TO RESPOND AND/OR FILE OPPOSITION TO THE PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFTS. THE NEW DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF A RESPONSE OR OPPOSITION IS 2/17/2019. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/25/19. 1/29/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
January 25, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE: RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or in the alternative MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by STEPHEN CRISTAL. (CRISTAL, STEPHEN) Modified on 1/28/2019 (afm, ). (FILED IN ERROR, FORWARDED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL)
January 18, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or in the alternative, MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by LOWE'S, SYNCHRONY BANK.Memorandum of Law, Certificate of Service.(BAILEY, SARAH)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFTS SHALL HAVE UNTIL 1/18/2019 TO RESPOND TO PLFF'S COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 12/28/18. 12/28/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
December 26, 2018 Filing 4 STIPULATION for Extension of Time by LOWE'S, SYNCHRONY BANK. (BAILEY, SARAH) (FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY; COPY FORWARDED TO JUDGE) Modified on 12/28/2018 (nd, ).
December 21, 2018 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. for LOWE'S., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. by LOWE'S, SYNCHRONY BANK.(rf, )
December 21, 2018 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL for SYNCHRONY BANK., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by LOWE'S, SYNCHRONY BANK.(rf, )
December 21, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LOWE'S, SYNCHRONY BANK from PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, case number SC-18-10-22-5959. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE189809), EXHIBITS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(rf, )
December 21, 2018 Case Eligible for Arbitration(ahf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CRISTAL v. SYNCHRONY BANK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOWE'S
Represented By: SARAH ELIZABETH BAILEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SYNCHRONY BANK
Represented By: SARAH ELIZABETH BAILEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHEN CRISTAL
Represented By: STEPHEN H. CRISTAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?