BRANDON v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff: DAVID BRANDON
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Case Number: 2:2019cv00104
Filed: January 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G SMITH
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. #4 ) IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; BRANDON, #18008211, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350.00 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B). BASED ON THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION BRANDON HAS PROVIDED, THE COURT WILL NOT ASSESS AN INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE; ETC. AS HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF THE GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II). BRANDON MAY NOT FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/8/19. 2/8/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND A COPY OF THE ORDER MAILED TO THE WARDEN OF THE GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.(mas, )
February 8, 2019 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/8/19. 2/8/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas, )
February 1, 2019 Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by DAVID BRANDON. (pr, )
February 1, 2019 Filing 4 Application for prisoners to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by DAVID BRANDON.Certification.(pr, )
January 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT IF BRANDON SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION, HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) SUBMIT $400.00 (THE $350.00 FILING FEE AND $50.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT (OR INSTITUTIONAL EQUIVALENT) SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD FROM JULY 8, 2018, THROUGH JANUARY 8, 2019, REFLECTING ACCOUNT ACTIVITY FROM THAT TIME PERIOD, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 1/10/19. 1/10/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF CURRENT IFP FORM.(er, )
January 8, 2019 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf)
January 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (NO FEE, NO IFP), filed by DAVID BRANDON.(ahf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRANDON v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID BRANDON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?