BRANDON v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
DAVID BRANDON |
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
2:2019cv00104 |
January 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. #4 ) IS GRANTED AND THE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; BRANDON, #18008211, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350.00 IN INSTALLMENTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(B). BASED ON THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION BRANDON HAS PROVIDED, THE COURT WILL NOT ASSESS AN INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE; ETC. AS HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF THE GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(E)(2)(B)(II). BRANDON MAY NOT FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/8/19. 2/8/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND A COPY OF THE ORDER MAILED TO THE WARDEN OF THE GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.(mas, ) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/8/19. 2/8/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(mas, ) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by DAVID BRANDON. (pr, ) |
Filing 4 Application for prisoners to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by DAVID BRANDON.Certification.(pr, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT IF BRANDON SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION, HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) SUBMIT $400.00 (THE $350.00 FILING FEE AND $50.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT (OR INSTITUTIONAL EQUIVALENT) SHOWING ALL DEPOSITS, WITHDRAWALS, AND A CURRENT BALANCE, FROM ANY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH HE WAS CONFINED FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD FROM JULY 8, 2018, THROUGH JANUARY 8, 2019, REFLECTING ACCOUNT ACTIVITY FROM THAT TIME PERIOD, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 1/10/19. 1/10/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF CURRENT IFP FORM.(er, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (NO FEE, NO IFP), filed by DAVID BRANDON.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BRANDON v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAVID BRANDON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.