EPHLIN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
| JOHN EPHLIN and ROSEMARIE EPHLIN |
| MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC. |
| 2:2019cv00150 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ROSEMARIE EPHLIN, JOHN EPHLIN. MERCK & CO., INC. waiver sent on 1/23/2019, answer due 3/25/2019; MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. waiver sent on 1/23/2019, answer due 3/25/2019. (FUNK, ADAM) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance of Attorney Dino Sangiamo for Merck & Co., Inc. and MerckSharp & Dohme Corp filed by MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP..CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(SANGIAMO, DINO) Modified on 1/14/2019 (kp, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 190701.), filed by ROSEMARIE EPHLIN, JOHN EPHLIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JOHN EPHLIN, ROSEMARIE EPHLIN. (ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. 2 Forwarded To: Counsel on 1/10/2019 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
