ACOSTA v. VICDANIA HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
| R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA |
| DANETTE MOORE and VICDANIA HEALTH SERVICES, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00169 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONSENT JUDGMENT ENTERED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/15/2019. 1/16/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT JUDGMENT (DOC. #2 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL DOCKET AND ENTER THE ATTACHED CONSENT JUDGMENT AS A FINAL JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/15/2019.1/16/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(LUBY, ANDREA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DANETTE MOORE, VICDANIA HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, filed by R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form, #4 Exhibit)(jwl, ) |
| Summons Issued as to DANETTE MOORE, VICDANIA HEALTH SERVICES, LLC. Two Forwarded To: Counsel on 1/11/19 (jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
